Literature is vast
Millions of papers per year. No way to know what's been done without weeks of reading.
4M+ papers/year"Do neighborhoods with more green space have lower rates of childhood asthma?"
Skimming 60+ papers to understand what's already been studied.
Finding EPA, Census, and CDC datasets across 4 repositories.
Writing boilerplate to join and clean the data.
Running the actual analysis for the first time.
A 2019 Nature paper controlled for the same confounders.
"I spent three weeks learning I was asking the wrong question."
Most of those 56 hours weren't science. They were setup — before a researcher could even know if the experiment was worth running.
Millions of papers per year. No way to know what's been done without weeks of reading.
4M+ papers/yearRelevant datasets live across dozens of repositories in incompatible formats.
No universal data layerSame boilerplate rewritten every project. No shared memory. No compounding.
8M researchers, same overheadFabricates papers that don't exist.
Plausible output, zero real code on real data.
No audit trail. Can't build on what you can't see.
Every reference verified from live academic databases.
Actual execution on real datasets. Reproducible, auditable.
You review findings before NeuriCo proceeds. Judgment stays yours.
Your question, plain English.
What's done, what gaps remain.
Finds & joins public datasets.
Real code. Is there a signal?
Day one, not week three.
Active researchers across AI, biology, public health, data science — all facing the same overhead.
"I wonder if…" to preliminary evidence in hours, not the two weeks needed to validate a hypothesis.
University lab subscriptions. 10 labs at $200/mo = $24k ARR. Scales with institutional budgets.
Why nowLLMs can finally run real code on real data. The loop between "I wonder if…" and "here's evidence" can be hours instead of weeks. NeuriCo is purpose-built to compress that loop — without replacing the researcher's judgment.